The Journey from Raw Personality Traits to True Mastery

It is a mistake to call every beginner of any of the Yogas a “Yogi.” Yoga, or communion, is achieved by hard and constant spiritual practice, and can be hastened. . . only by karmic accumulations. Therefore, it is wrong to say that ‘A Raja Yogi sometimes becomes a fanatic; a Jnana Yogi an intellectual speculator; and a Bhakti Yogi a religious zealot who rejoices at the ‘righteous’ punishment of heretics.’ Rather, it would be more correct to say that ‘those who have certain inclinations which may lead them to become in their later incarnations Raja Yogis may first manifest themselves as fanatics; those with tendencies toward Jnana as intellectual pedants; and those with Bhakti tendencies as religious hypocrites.’ Once, however, a high degree of true Yoga is achieved (either Raja, Bhakti or Jnana), there can be no real perversion of the guiding principles in such an intense way. A king of spirit cannot become a fanatic, and a Jnana-Philosopher possessing the eye of Dangma cannot become an idle intellectual pedant; neither can a Bhakti—a lord of the cosmic magnet of the all-embracing heart—rejoice at ‘righteous punishment.’ When the Teaching mentions there are “signs of the Hatha Yogi in the unbearable athlete, signs of the Bhakti Yogi in the hypocrite, and signs of the Raja Yogi in the Fanatic,” it is pointing out characteristic inclinations which, if transmuted by spiritual fire, would lead into one or another of the different types of Yoga. But not vice versa! Letters of Helena Roerich, vol I, 6 May 1934

COMMENTARY:

In this insightful comment, Helena Roerich addresses a common misconception: confusing a beginner’s raw, untamed personality traits with the fully realized state of a true master. She explains that people often unfairly judge spiritual disciplines by the flaws of novices—mistaking the fanaticism, intellectual pedantry, or religious hypocrisy of beginners for the end results of the Raja (will), Jnana (knowledge), and Bhakti (devotion) yogic paths. Instead, Mme. Roerich reframes these negative behaviors not as failures of the Teachings, but as the initial, unrefined inclinations of individuals who are naturally drawn toward those specific paths.

The true essence of any path, H.R. argues, is achieved only through dedication and the “spiritual fire” that purifies these raw tendencies. Once genuine mastery is reached, those initial flaws are transformed completely; the fanatic becomes a grounded spiritual leader, the over-thinker gains profound clarity and vision, and the zealot develops an all-embracing, compassionate heart. Ultimately, this quote reminds us that the flaws we see in ourselves or others at the start of any demanding journey are simply the raw materials waiting to be refined into true excellence.

Being an over-thinker, would you speak a little more about how flaws can become refined?

I meant me, of course.

This is a test to see if the reply shows up

This is an approach to consider. Let’s say that a person, a disciple, discovers a character flaw in their “fabric.” What to do? Take a look at the flaw, select a handful of qualities to polish the flaw, with the ultimate result of changing the flaw into a virtue, via “quality polishing.” What I mean by this is that when a disciple recognizes an imperfection woven into the fabric of their character, the task is not to battle the flaw, but to transmute it through the practice of qualities. By observing the imperfection with detached discernment, the disciple can consciously invoke a constellation of qualities. Through the sustained discipline of ‘quality polishing’—applying the steady friction of the beauty of the quality—the lower tendency is gradually transmuted, ultimately forging a radiant virtue in its place. I’ve tried it, it works ! Love, Joleen

Beautiful and inspiring! Thank you, Joleen!